data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59e41/59e415df960768186cf3949d3016639a4e06ac5b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a987b/a987bb8f94f8e0585143a5ed9e3ca4937c7b9eaa" alt=""
3·
20 hours agoIn a invasion we don’t have to think about software kill switches, each tower can be trivially destroyed.
In a invasion we don’t have to think about software kill switches, each tower can be trivially destroyed.
The cell phone network might be a day 0 target, but Cell phones would be left mostly untouched, they are easy to track/drone strike. Interference would only happen acutely for IED concerns or cqb operations
GPS/Satellite location would be jammed / disabled
Internet connections would be targeted, sea cables, microwave, etc
Electrical systems would be targeted.
Prioritize:
Cell phone towers are not critical infrastructure, destroying them is just the cost of war.
Hydroelectric dams, nuclear power plants, anything that takes a long time to build, would be spared if the intent is to takeover.
Off the cuff invasion scenario:
Cut the population off so they can’t organize, destroy the military, secure critical assets. Since most of the CA population lives within 100km of the boarder the only real pernicious worry will be submarines deployed and further afield military posts in the north.