I’m not sure if you’re accusing me or the journalist of The Maple of bad faith here. Your argumentation is mixed up. I’m not a journalist, I’m some guy on Lemmy and fuck no I don’t have good faith towards soldiers if a genocidal apartheid regime.
Whether war crimes allegations can be individualized to them, that’s for prosecutors to find out. The article adds pressure to Canadian authorities to act. That’s the job of the journalist. It’s then the job of lawyers, prosecutors etc to decide what to act on, what to investigate etc.
Your comments point in the same direction: You say, “if” they did, and “may” have participated in war crimes. But “if” and “may” is no research. These are assumptions.
I’m not sure if you’re accusing me or the journalist of The Maple of bad faith here. Your argumentation is mixed up. I’m not a journalist, I’m some guy on Lemmy and fuck no I don’t have good faith towards soldiers if a genocidal apartheid regime.
Whether war crimes allegations can be individualized to them, that’s for prosecutors to find out. The article adds pressure to Canadian authorities to act. That’s the job of the journalist. It’s then the job of lawyers, prosecutors etc to decide what to act on, what to investigate etc.
They are not assumptions. They are conditionals.