An article from this weekend that seemingly got buried by soundbites about the Steam Machine price in the same interview, but given that we have no information on price, this seems way more interesting to me. I mean…I basically self-select games that don’t use these kinds of anti-cheat at all, but this is important information for a lot of people, especially if you’re looking for an off-ramp from Windows and still want to play some of the most popular live service titles.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’m aware but games and players still want a strong anti cheating solution. There is no protection currently on linux for cheating.

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      First, it’s not true that there’s no protection - various anti-cheat solutions do support Linux.

      Second, “strong” solutions still let through cheaters, because client-side anti cheat is an inherently unwinnable cat-and-mouse game. It’s better for everyone to block kernel-level AC and instead force better backend solutions.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        58 minutes ago

        Uh no I’m a linux user and i know the anti cheats that do support linux do basically nothing since any root process can hook in. If majority of gamers were on linux multiplayer games would be unplayable.

        Anti cheat is always a Cat and mouse solution not just on the client side and that doesnt mean its bad and cat and mouse solutions do still reduce cheaters.

        Good server side anti cheat is a perfect ideal solution, its never existed and I don’t think it will exist.