• CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Actually, literally why not. I bet you could come up with some kind of actuarial argument about what being undefended would cost us, on average.

    • kbal@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s an expensive business to be in. If the military is going to turn a profit we’ll need to start looking for better wars to get involved in, ones that really maximize the opportunities for plunder.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Ah, but you aren’t considering the downside risk that [insert badguy nation] invades us and turns us all into slaves.

        Car or house insurance doesn’t turn a profit for the policyholder either. It’s not exactly the same thing, but in both cases it’s purely preventative, while still an economic good idea.

        • kbal@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Sure, you’ve got to consider both sides of the equation: Use your military might to plunder distant lands faster and harder than their armies are able to plunder your own land. It’s the fiscally prudent way to run things.