Do we have any proof those reviews were from people following that curator? I imagine that information has also been posted elsewhere online.

Why does that curator exist in the first place? Why are those reviews still up?

Do you think off topic reviews or curator recommendations should be allowed for things you approve of? Say if a review points out the developer is a secret fascist?

Great comeback! I really love whatabaoutism.

Oh please, moderating a forum unpaid for 5 mins every now and again is so easy it’s how this whole platform and Reddit function.

Please, kindly refrain from talking about things you know jack shit about.

If you’re truly an indie dev without the resources to moderate your own space, Steam allow you to simply close the forums and forbid discussions.

Steam forums are a resource for devs to interact with the community, get feedback, etc…
Closing them means losing a resource. What you suggest is that devs big enough to employ a community manager should have access to that resource, while small/solo devs should just accept that they can’t have it. Sounds like second class citizen treatment to me.

It would be a lot easier if Steam got their shit together and started moderating their online spaces, which is something they should’ve been doing this whole time.