It’s interesting to perspectives from elsewhere. The Netherlands is also facing a housing crisis, and they’re also talking about significant increases in construction. Part of that will be to limit local control.
Interestingly, they’re also talking about changing the type of construction: fewer rooms.
There isn’t quite enough context to explain why that would help, but it’s something I haven’t really heard politicians saying here in Canada.
What changes would you make to speed up housing growth here?
The playbook for building massive amounts of housing at affordable prices exists already, you can copy basically everything Sweden did in their project Miljonprogrammet.
With the density afforded by this construction pattern it also makes lots of sense to build great transit in connection with the area, and some retail nearby/in the same building. This further improves the overall efficiency of the area
I think this is known everywhere, except that
So 3 and 4 is what we’re getting in practice, but for 1 and 2 we need a proper government running by decent people, which has been hard to come by. We can’t even do the bare minimum of 1 and 2 to build supportive housing for the homeless…
Sadly, it appears the lessons from the Miljonprogrammet have been lost in Sweden too. Last I checked housing in Göteborg and Stockholm (and to a lesser extent Malmö and Uppsala) has also become unaffordable to purchase for folks, with privat sector rents going through the roof and social housing programs struggling to keep up with the increasing demand.
Oh yeah, they have definitely been forgotten here.
From what I understand, 3 and 4 are the current plan from the feds. 1 and 2 would be cool too.