It’s interesting to perspectives from elsewhere. The Netherlands is also facing a housing crisis, and they’re also talking about significant increases in construction. Part of that will be to limit local control.

Interestingly, they’re also talking about changing the type of construction: fewer rooms.

There isn’t quite enough context to explain why that would help, but it’s something I haven’t really heard politicians saying here in Canada.

What changes would you make to speed up housing growth here?

  • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    A) most development marketed as “luxury” are not actually luxury in any sort of way. It’s just a marketing tactic.

    B) I wouldn’t expect this to be built by for profit developers. The government should be the one building it.

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      “Luxury” means “market value”, i.e., will be rented/sold for maximum profit margin.

    • Silver Needle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      B) I wouldn’t expect this to be built by for profit developers. The government should be the one building it.

      I think this is a wholly sensible wish. The thing is however that the governments are building nothing in this political climate and would rather wait for people to die off to make room.