Your location and proximity to a conflict has no bearing on your comprehension of international legal systems.
Totally!
Too bad you wouldn’t indulge me, the rest of our mini convo is pointless. This would actually be something new and interesting (if you actually answered in good faith, which based on your most recent reply, you are not willing to do).
I have no reason to indulge you on anything. I have simply offered reasonable criticism of your comments on citizenship and deporting citizens and I will continue to offer criticism without veering off into irrelevant discussion.
You have offered no refutation of my statements at all and have only personally criticised me for my lack of proximity to a conflict.
You might learn why your proposal is illegal under international and humanitarian law if you bothered to read.
Bullshit! You have no fucking clue about the meaning of human rights. You’re just reading some stuff online and you have no understanding of how the real world works.
The truth is you don’t actually care about “international and humanitarian law” beyond acting out online. It’s purely an aesthetic thing for you.
You quote the universal declaration of human rights without even considering how to truly implement it and the kind of choices society would have to make.
All that shows is that you don’t actually care about about the UDHR. You’re out of your depth and you know it (you wont admit it here and you’ll keep “fighting back”, but we both know the truth).
None of what you’ve said addresses citizenship, the legalities around the stripping of citizenship or the deporting of a country’s own citizens.
Easy enough to make flippant remarks when you have zero clue what you’re actually talking about.
Your location and proximity to a conflict has no bearing on your comprehension of international legal systems.
Totally!
Too bad you wouldn’t indulge me, the rest of our mini convo is pointless. This would actually be something new and interesting (if you actually answered in good faith, which based on your most recent reply, you are not willing to do).
I have no reason to indulge you on anything. I have simply offered reasonable criticism of your comments on citizenship and deporting citizens and I will continue to offer criticism without veering off into irrelevant discussion.
You have offered no refutation of my statements at all and have only personally criticised me for my lack of proximity to a conflict.
You might learn why your proposal is illegal under international and humanitarian law if you bothered to read.
Bullshit! You have no fucking clue about the meaning of human rights. You’re just reading some stuff online and you have no understanding of how the real world works.
The truth is you don’t actually care about “international and humanitarian law” beyond acting out online. It’s purely an aesthetic thing for you.
You quote the universal declaration of human rights without even considering how to truly implement it and the kind of choices society would have to make.
All that shows is that you don’t actually care about about the UDHR. You’re out of your depth and you know it (you wont admit it here and you’ll keep “fighting back”, but we both know the truth).
All the best!