“I came across this at a very sad point in my life, it was on a hard drive on a vintage computer I bought off Amazon,” Marshall explains on the expansion’s GitHub page. “Literally this essentially saved my life, I was going through a divorce and just happen[ing] to come across something like this was insane.”

  • KssioAug@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 day ago

    It might as well be his doom (pun intended). Can’t Activision file a lawsuit against him for uploading that on Github?

    • AmyAye@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Activision and Github are both part of the same company too. Maybe a different Git would have been better.

      • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        1 day ago

        No? GitHub is owned by Microsoft

        Edit: I’m wrong. Apparently Microsoft owns Activision blizzard?!

        Oh no…

        • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          1 day ago

          How on earth did you miss that? It was in the news for years, the biggest buyout with 69 BILLION dollars. It’s actually Activision-Blizzard-King, King being the company responsible for mobile game hits like Candy Crush (that’s why its in your start menu).

      • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I like Codeberg, but I don’t think they would allow a project of this size, especially given the liability.

            • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Could use git, sure. Would make it easier to merge longer tailed sets of changes for sure, though maybe harder to pass around anonymously, assuming you’re taking about repositories.

    • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Seeing as he obtained it legally, albeit by accident, I think it would be whoever sold the hard disk that’s at fault. Granted, IANAL and the American legal system is fucky.

      Edit: Yeah I’m not a lawyer.

      • Thorry@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Nah that’s not how that works. He might have obtained it legally and accidentally. But he made the decision to then distribute it. He can most definitely get sued for that. If you want to distribute basically anything, you need the right permissions / license for that.

      • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        He doesn’t hold the copyright so has no right to distribute it. Like if you bought a manuscript from a book you don’t have the right to print copies of it and distribute it. Since you only are the owner of that specific manuscript not the copyright and distribution rights of the actual content.

      • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Just finding something by accident doesn’t give you the right to publish it.

        If you found someone manuscript in the drawer of a desk you bought, you would not gain the right to publish it, it still belongs to the person that wrote it. Physical possession has nothing to do with the right to distribute, that is IP law that goes back a hundred years.