Who cares what she said? Well, literally anyone who cares about the legal basis for the USA. It wasn’t her personal opinion. She was delivering the legal definition of the USA’s legitimate claims to its territory on the continent on behalf of the entire government, with the support of the majority of SCOTUS justices.
What the hell kind of response is this anyway? Who cares what RGB said? That’s inane. It’s clear what the point is. RGB was not only NOT a Trump appointee, not a Bush appointee, but also a literal DARLING of the Democrat Party and the American Liberal zeitgeist and even SHE, with ZERO expediency pressure and ALL of the resources available, put in formal writing, reinforcing the highest law of the land, that the US exists ONLY because the Pope said it was OK to genocide savages.
Who cares what she said? Well, literally anyone who cares about the legal basis for the USA. It wasn’t her personal opinion. She was delivering the legal definition of the USA’s legitimate claims to its territory on the continent on behalf of the entire government, with the support of the majority of SCOTUS justices.
What the hell kind of response is this anyway? Who cares what RGB said? That’s inane. It’s clear what the point is. RGB was not only NOT a Trump appointee, not a Bush appointee, but also a literal DARLING of the Democrat Party and the American Liberal zeitgeist and even SHE, with ZERO expediency pressure and ALL of the resources available, put in formal writing, reinforcing the highest law of the land, that the US exists ONLY because the Pope said it was OK to genocide savages.