• Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    10 years?

    My friend, many of us have been warning about SaaS since long before the public knew it as Cloud.

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Anyone using the national domain registrar? Does it only resolve nationally, if you buy from there, as the article implies…?

    But you want your domain over the world. Cool, do you have enough clients to need this? Then you can hire a person in each country to buy you a domain from the local registry.

    I’ve been interested in getting a domain name, but it always just felt like a scam to pay a monthly fee for an entry in a database. If the national registrar is good enough, that would be cool.

    Although, I guess, if it is not, I’d at least still be somewhat more at peace with that, since it would mean the intermediate company actually does something…

    • Max@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I believe most (all?) registrars should let you give them a global DNS server, at which point your domain should be resolvable globally. Whether it’s reachable isn’t at the registration level, it’s at the DNS level. The blog author’s comment confuses me. Maybe they mean like having a TLD that matches each country with users? Seems not worth it.

      You can get a domain for like $10 a year from many places. The national registrar I looked up was like $7 a year (Brazil).

      • Hal@piefed.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I thought the implication was that you may only be able to buy from that registrar if you’re from/in that country?

        • Max@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Yeah, I think that’s right, but where your clients are is irrelevant. That’s what confused me about the author’s statement.