Jami
www.jami.net
Jami - the distributed and open source communication platform

Firstly: Yes, I like Synapse / Cinny / Element too…don’t hate me…but needs must when the devil drives…

For reasons that are too complex to get into (TL;DR: hodge podge of equipment from the dawn of time, from intransigent family members, complexity over HTTP vs HTTPS…they usual nonsense when you volunteer to become the family sysadmin) I’ve been looking at different methods for a persistent, family chat experience that I can “self host”.

Does anyone know much about Jami?

https://www.jami.net/

From what I can see, it has the following worthwhile features:

  • FOSS/GPL
  • Android, Windows, Linux, macOS and iOS.
  • Text messaging ,group chats, video calls
  • File sharing, E2EE etc etc
  • It apparently works over a LAN with no Internet connection at all, which is particularly interesting to me.
  • Federation not required.
  • CA not required
  • Transparent handoff with Tailscale

From what I can see, there’s a headless jami-daemon for Linux. Jami’s own docs specifically suggest putting an existing account on an always-online server to facilitate message exchange, with multiple servers possible for redundancy.

So…that’s…good.

OTOH, there isn’t a Synapse-equivalent central Jami server holding everyone’s accounts and rooms. Accounts and conversations are distributed across the participating devices, though as I said above, it looks like Jami does support an always-online daemon/device to improve message availability.

I dunno what to make of it. It seems…too good to be true.

Has anyone use it? Particularly, is the always-online jami-daemon actually dependable for store-and-forward behavior in practice?

https://github.com/savoirfairelinux

EDIT: This was an interesting experiment, but Jami is far too unreliable even without UnifiedPush / DHT (which I think is the main issue). I presented the work done so far and the consensus is to look at using IRC (as most of the users are familiar with that) and having Janus as the video chat / WebRTC server. It seems to work on all of their devices and doesn’t have any of the cute issues we encountered with Synapse / Matrix

TL;DR the fam has settled on -

I’m tied, boss. Never volunteer.

  • sbird@retrofed.comEnglish
    2·
    2 days ago

    Well, there’s also IRC and XMPP. Could those work better for older devices? Dunno, but neither are encrypted, so don’t use them for anything sensitive. Signal is good if you want security, they’ve been audited a lot, but they are based in the U.S. which isn’t great.

    I’ve also heard of Stoat (formerly Revolt) and Fluxer, both are relatively new, but I would prefer Matrix over both since it’s more easily self-hostable (+ all those different clients to choose from!)

    edit: I really didn’t know, but looks like XMPP does support encryption! (and it’s enabled by default on most clients!)

    • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zoneOPEnglish
      1·
      12 hours ago

      Just a little postscript for you, sbird

      TL;DR the fam has settled on -

      Ergo as IRC server: https://ergo.chat/
The Lounge as PWA IRC client: https://thelounge.chat/
Janus for video calls: https://janus.conf.meetecho.com/index.html
I will host all this on the Pi at my place and they can tailscale in.

      So, it looks like ye ancient IRC has saved the day.

      Thanks for the suggestion; I never would have thought of it.

      PS: I’m tied, boss. Never volunteer.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nlEnglish
      7·
      1 day ago

      IRC supports TLS encryption. Many large networks don’t actually have it enabled or use self-signed certs because they still think it’s the 1990’s, but if you make your own server you can use TLS just fine.

    • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zoneOPEnglish
      31·
      1 day ago

      You know, I had to do a double take when you mentioned IRC, but it’s actually come a long way since I used it last.

      https://github.com/ergochat/ergo

      https://thelounge.chat/

      And unlike Jami, it really IS self hosted.

      Good idea; thanks for that. I realise IRC doesn’t have native video / audio calling but that’s probably a smaller problem to solve / bolt onto that trying to juggle Matrix across multiple unruly devices

      EDIT: … IRC has video and voice calls now?

      https://github.com/AndroidIRCx/AndroidIRCx

      Wat

      • undrwater@lemmy.worldEnglish
        3·
        1 day ago

        IRC is great. The challenge is picking a client for the family, and getting them set up. It’s not friction free.

    • ambitiousslab@feddit.ukEnglish
      8·
      2 days ago

      neither are encrypted, so don’t use them for anything sensitive

      I run XMPP - just wanted to say that all major XMPP clients (the ones I’m thinking of are Conversations, Monal, Dino and Gajim, among others) encrypt-by-default, you have to actively go out of your way to disable it per contact.

      • sbird@retrofed.comEnglish
        3·
        1 day ago

        That’s actually pretty cool, I’ll be making an XMPP account then. Adding to my collection of chat apps!

      • sbird@retrofed.comEnglish
        2·
        2 days ago

        Oh whoops, I didn’t know that! That’s kind of neat, didn’t know had encryption. I will amend my comment