PlayStation is reportedly sending a lengthy survey to game developers with a question about how they sell physical games after their decision to stop producing physical game discs prompted intense backlash.
PlayStation is reportedly sending a lengthy survey to game developers with a question about how they sell physical games after their decision to stop producing physical game discs prompted intense backlash.
And while you’re at it, open up the OS so it’s more than just a game console. And it would be nice if it had interchangeable parts so we could customize the hardware.
Wait a minute…
I think the next Xbox is supposed to be more open, but still, yeah, just a buy a PC… when it’s affordable… gulp
Magic 8-ball, when will PC prices be affordable?
Dammit, I think my magic 8-ball is busted. Whenever I ask about PC prices, it just keeps saying THAT!!!
…except later never comes.
Unless there’s a massive bubble pop, not for 5+ years. Thanks to all the long term agreements!
All the more reason to milk my AM4 build for all it’s worth.
Right???
They do that. They still sell PCs, as far as I know. Consoles are subsidized because you have to buy from them.
Those PCs just don’t run PlayStation games (unless they have a PC version).
I always felt like if you bought a PC, you should be able to buy a license to play Xbox and/or PlayStation games on it. Just have to pay the piper. Sadly it didn’t work like that. They all make money if you buy multiple machines, so they will push you in that direction if you want more diversity in your gaming.
That would require every console game to be compatible with PC. In theory it’s at least possible for any game that has a PC port to just give you the port, but not every game does. And for those that do, well, why pay for this service over just buying the ports?
There are so many other factors and motivations that a) keep console games from being PC compatible and b) incentivize closed console ecosystems
It’s one of my pet peeves around the the online discourse regarding discs. So many people are looking at the issue one-dimensionally, and don’t have a full picture of motivations and implications.
I’m not gonna pretend it’s not about profit. Of course it’s all about money. But it is decisively not “we’re gonna make more money by taking people’s stuff away when we feel like it”