The website decomp.dev said Thursday that it is shutting down because “the community aspect of decompilation has been broken” by AI, and that projects that once required intense collaboration between people with different skills can now be done trivially with AI. The administrator of the website said that it has become impossible to keep track of which projects are primarily human-led and which ones are done by AI.
“Historically, matching decompilation has been a brutally difficult, time consuming task, on the scale of years for any moderately-sized game with a number of active contributors,” the pseudonymous admin of decomp.dev, who goes by Encounter, wrote on the site.
But recent frontier AI models like GPT-6-Astra have made it trivially easy to decompile a game: “They are significantly better at following complex directions, cross-referencing resources for symbols or debug information, and writing natural code with enough guidance,” Encounter wrote. “It is now clear that, with the right guidance, human input, and code reviews, AI can expedite the decompilation process in a significant way. What is also now clear is that the community aspect of decompilation has been broken.”
AI-powered video game decomps and recomps (recompiling code after modifying it) are everywhere. People have, for example, used AI to put Mario into Elden Ring, port games to platforms they were never designed to work on, or to combine various games in any permutations you could possibly imagine. In recent days, tools specifically designed to decomp games with AI have popped up, such as “decomp.wtf,” which promises to “point the AI agent you already use at a game you own. decomp.wtf turns it back into C, one function at a time, and checks every function byte for byte against the original.”
Decomp.dev was a collaborative website that hosted file libraries and tools for reverse engineering, re-coding, and decompiling existing video games, meaning taking an existing game and recreating its source code. Decompiling a video game can be done for a variety of reasons and is popular in a few different niches of video game fandom. Speed runners decompile video games to find potential glitches or advantages they can use to beat a game faster; hobbyists decompile video games to port them to new platforms or to emulate them (for example, making Super Mario 64 run natively on PC); modders decompile games so they can more easily modify them; archivists decompile games to recreate code that may be lost; and some people decompile games just for the challenge.
Encounter wrote that the use of AI in the community has sped things up to the point where it has become overwhelming to track human-led projects, and people using AI have taken existing, human-led AI projects and have created “hostile forks” of them, where open-source code written by humans is taken and “finished” by AI: “These kinds of hostile forks put little to no effort into meaningfully contributing to existing projects, tearing apart our community fabric.” Encounter added, “anyone with an AI subscription can manage to create a port or static recompilation that functions at a basic level […] While community members put in the effort to decompile a game, opportunists have frequently raced to release a half-baked, barely-functional port from it.”



I think the AI luddites are playing into the hands of the wealthy, if they aren’t actually secret allies.
The problems with AI boil down to individuals having too much personal influence over humanity, no different from personal ownership of factories, banks, politicians, PMCs, and churches.
Everyone telling me and other weak individuals to not use local AI, are basically trying to strangle a new form of democracy in the cradle.
My friend. That chatbot isnt giving you individual freedom. It’s owned by a billionaire that is cooking our planet, and it is being tasked with doing the fun creative jobs faster than you.
The end goal isn’t individual democracy. It’s to make you work 10 hour shifts in the lithium mines to pay for your weekly subscription to Claude v47, which will make soulless content for you to absorb in the short period between your mining job, and the second job you need to pay for food and rent.
I use a local AI open weight model, Qwen Next-Flash. I don’t pay for a subscription, and it isn’t doing the ‘fun creative jobs’, it is digging through code and building programs.
You’re not a programmer are you.
Nope. Math and coding aren’t my passions. Leave that stuff to the people who enjoy doing those things, or to AI.
Far as I am concerned, the important thing is the result, not the process. I don’t have the money to hire a person, so it falls to AI to realize my intentions.