The update got released over 2 months ago. So sensible admins should not be getting hit by this.

Also I use Jellyfin btw.

  • Auli@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I think people over blow how dangerous it is. Or maybe its better most people dont. I don’t know I know the issues and I take measures to mitigate them. Then if someone gets in they would be limited to vlan. And if somebody gets out of that good wasted so much effort for nothing since I have nothing that would be worth that much trouble.

    And before someone says identity pretty sire that has been in so many other leaks overt the years the information is pretty old.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Even without data compromise or pivoting, they can still mine crypto on your hardware, launch a ddos, spam email, do botnet stuff, or host CSAM.

      • fonix232@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Not if your Jellyfin is set up correctly.

        Read-only, rootless container with only the cache/transcode/config folders mounted RW+noexec - ideally both with a volume size limit.

        Reverse proxy only the absolutely minimal ports needed, with some security measures (e.g. crowdsec transparent proxy, hooked up to both your firewall and reverse proxy to block malicious actors.

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          The start of this thread is “number one reason people don’t move to Jellyfin is ease of remote access.”

          30 years ago I was compiling slackware and configuring dns servers, and setting up BGP on Ciscos. But a few hours of attempting to setup Jellyfin was a failure. It was far more complex than setting up dns/bind.