Yeah, well here, we don’t have landladies. I’m not sure what other point you’d been trying to make, because I couldn’t bother reading/retaining it. But yeah. Your point is invalid because no landlady.
The point was, the law - at least in this region - says one may not smoke at all within range (I think it’s 9 meters) of a door to where someone works.
If you’re in a multi-unit building, and one of your neighbours works from home, as a homemaker or a parent or remotely, the question moves from a preference question to a criminal question.
I’ll try to keep my reply under 5,000 words so it’s not too daunting to read.
… ah, I see, nuance and the finer art of subtle jabs are lost on you. You completely missed the point, twice. I shouldn’t be surprised, I guess, since you admitted you don’t retain things you read, and/or you don’t bother to read posts before replying.
Yeah, well here, we don’t have landladies. I’m not sure what other point you’d been trying to make, because I couldn’t bother reading/retaining it. But yeah. Your point is invalid because no landlady.
The point was, the law - at least in this region - says one may not smoke at all within range (I think it’s 9 meters) of a door to where someone works.
If you’re in a multi-unit building, and one of your neighbours works from home, as a homemaker or a parent or remotely, the question moves from a preference question to a criminal question.
I’ll try to keep my reply under 5,000 words so it’s not too daunting to read.
… ah, I see, nuance and the finer art of subtle jabs are lost on you. You completely missed the point, twice. I shouldn’t be surprised, I guess, since you admitted you don’t retain things you read, and/or you don’t bother to read posts before replying.