Not because DDG got better, but just because google got worse.

google is still better for site-specific searches, and google scholar still has minimal AI slop

  • JackLSauce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “just as good”? No, I feel it is (and has been for years) vastly superior but I mostly use it to find documentation or Stack Overflow answers so consistent UI and concise summaries are high priority to me. Take that as you will

    I don’t think anybody can dethrone Google Maps yet but that’s another story

  • FRYD@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been using DDG exclusively for something like 8 years. It works great for regular text search and I use bing for image searches. I really don’t understand the reluctance of people to switch to it. To me, Google has been borderline unusable garbage for a long time.

    • toastal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cherry on the shit sundae was a couple months ago when Google started to require JavaScript be enabled for search.

    • irelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You probably already know this, but you can use search “bangs” to search other websites from ddg.

      For example, to search google, you would put !g or !google at the start of your search.