recursive_recursion@piefed.ca to Canada@lemmy.caEnglish · 1 year agoHow a woods ban to fight wildfires turned some Canadians into toddlersi.ytimg.comimagemessage-square26linkfedilinkarrow-up165arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up159arrow-down1imageHow a woods ban to fight wildfires turned some Canadians into toddlersi.ytimg.comrecursive_recursion@piefed.ca to Canada@lemmy.caEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square26linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareCypher@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down16·edit-21 year agoI could have missed it but I don’t recall her video saying the restrictions were intended to be temporary. Edit: anyone thinking this was a claim of permanent restrictions lacks reading comprehension
minus-squareVictor Villas@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoOnly conspiracy nuts would entertain the possibility that this isn’t getting lifted whenever the wildfire risk goes down
minus-squareLemmyoutofhere@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoYou forgot your tin foil hat.
minus-squareganryuu@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoSo, “not temporary” is different from “permanent” how exactly?
minus-squareCypher@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·1 year agoI didn’t make a claim I just said it wasn’t in the linked video.
I could have missed it but I don’t recall her video saying the restrictions were intended to be temporary.
Edit: anyone thinking this was a claim of permanent restrictions lacks reading comprehension
lol
Only conspiracy nuts would entertain the possibility that this isn’t getting lifted whenever the wildfire risk goes down
You forgot your tin foil hat.
So, “not temporary” is different from “permanent” how exactly?
I didn’t make a claim I just said it wasn’t in the linked video.