• MTK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    7 days ago

    Banning 1984 is insane to me. You have to be either so stupid that you decided it should be banned but completely missed the point of the book, or you have to be straight up cartoon levels of evil.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 days ago

      This was more a case of malicious compliance. Province said “give us a list of books you have that meet these stupid criteria” and the school boards took their amateurishly worded MO and produced a list that met that criteria.

      • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        Malicious compliance can mean finding ways to make a good law cause problems out of some other grievance, or it can be exposing how bad a law is by following it to its logical conclusion in a public and dramatic way. This is the latter, like those groups trying to get the bible removed in southern states with these kind of laws. It’s not about the bible, it’s about showing how bad book bans are.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      1984 was dropped from Ontario curriculum in 1984. My English teacher told us this and then quit at the end of the year. After that, there was only a stupid focus on Shakespeare.

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      Can’t think of a better advertisement for 1984 though, kids might actually read it these days thinking its an “illegal” book.