• 1 Post
  • 416 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: March 29th, 2025

help-circle




  • The empire is already here. The US really isn’t the empire. It is the power centre of the empire and it’s the enforcer of the empire, but it’s not the empire. It is one of many states captured by the empire. The empire itself is in the networks of capital and is already supranational. The Black Snake is part of the empire, as is mining, and finance, tech, the arms trade and more. They are all already here. People pit themselves against other nationalities as if it’s those people on the other side of the line who are the enemy, as those people mostly try to scrape by in their own lives. Like racism, nationalism is another divisive ideology that keeps people targeting others like themselves, keeping each other down and willing to sacrifice out of fear, all to the benefit of the real empire.




  • The point of CUSMA negotiations the whole time has been to try to maintain a position that benefits from deep integration with the US. What did people think it was about? Diversification is about hedging, reducing risk, and gaining leverage but the whole point of CUSMA negotiations is just trying to get the most favourable terms possible while trying to stay deeply integrated. Carney touts us having the best trade terms with them all the time. Our energy minister is touting Canada’s role in US energy dominance and pushing the idea of Fortress North America. We are integrating with NSA laws on border security, integrating with the Golden Dome, integrating on critical minerals, we are embracing massive military spending at their request while we won’t say shit about their illegal wars. There’s a disturbing trend towards blind patriotism in a segment of Carney supporters where they have fallen so hard for “elbows up” nationalism and Canadian exceptionalism that they turn anything into 4D chess kool-aid and deceive themselves into not trusting what’s right in front of their noses.












  • It seems like a good tool to have in doctor or other healthcare professional’s toolbox for delivering complex care, as long as complex care is provided and it’s not treated as a simple solution to a complex problem. Canada certainly has healthcare professionals with the skills and knowledge to provide complex care. As long as we have provincial systems that support and enable them to provide that care, and providers who choose that path, having this as a generic drug seems like a win to me.


  • That’s probably fair when talking about the electorate broadly, but also leaves out the powerful special interests contributing to shaping and manipulating the movement, and which have much more direct and influential access to provincial government than your average Jane or Joe. Those interests, and the stakeholders to which they’re most responsive, need to be included as part of any discussion of how this movement is developing.