Oh you’re right! My bad, sorry.

Huh, so I wonder why the graph lags behind the input data, then. The methodology page explains how they weight it, mostly.

That pretty much is the issue, yep. If she wins, it’s because she isn’t so totally unacceptable that she breaks the pattern.

No, it ends on Dec. 20th. It looks like your link is from 2026. They haven’t added it yet.

Huh, thanks. That’s actually more recent than the polls in the graph, I wonder when they’re going to get it put up.

Calgary is definitely going to be the battleground. Having a prominent former Calgary mayor as candidate should help at least a bit. I can’t say it’s impossible we’ll elect her again, but I can say all her ideas are unpopular, and that her messaging isn’t strong.

How? Would a poll work?

It’s only a minority.

PP doesn’t say we should join the US himself, why would literally everyone who voted for him?

Certain other provinces aren’t looking so great by that measure. And most of Canada, by land area.

None of these are safe, though. Just safer than actually doing violence yourself.

It seems like supplying fake IDs or doing sabotage would still fall under “fighter”. Even just as words “the fighters” and “the resistance” are somewhat synonymous.

I don’t think it’s even clear what’s going to happen in Venezuela yet.

PEI is Conservative, so is the Yukon now. I don’t really think you can make it a partisan thing.

We should ask roads and parking lots to at least break even. That they’re provided on government or business dime is related to the sprawl problem that’s making transit hard to set up.

Sewers arguably make drug dealer profit margins, the way certain municipalities charge for a hookup. Which has resulted in very little new construction even during the housing crisis.

Schools, yeah. It’s pretty obvious it is economically worth it, but only a long way down the road, like with basic research. And then there’s the whole “making better people” aspect of it, however much you buy that.

Is it? I think internally is a reasonable way to read that requirement. Even failing that, somewhere else would have to be more equal and just, somehow.

Happy cake day, by the way.

I know it’s the theory that the Western lifestyle in general is built on that, but Denmark’s state budget is pretty easy to verify as coming from Denmark.

You’re getting a lot of “none” answers, but that’s overly pessimistic, given that you used relative terms for almost everything, and free healthcare and education are standard first-world features.

The usual statistics wondercountries would be my answer. Canada, the Nordics and select other places in Western Europe like the Netherlands and Switzerland. New Zealand is having problems these days, but maybe them too, I’m not sure. They all lean towards these stances relative to other countries.

Cheap food is probably hardest thing. It just comes with a certain cost to produce or ship in.

Where from? Greenland is a big resource sink.

And it’s literally Hitler to leave hyperbolic comments online. /s

The guy should get fired from his own blog? Lol.

China, maybe even India if the Khalistan stuff gets out of hand.

Like, the US is by far the main threat directly to us right now, but it’s a big world and a long future.

besides Trump, and we know that’s not likely

Do we? Sometimes he TACOs, but sometimes he does exactly what he said he would. And what about whoever the next American autocrat is?

Getting in on one of the European umbrellas would be much better, though. We could even have British or French warheads on a Canadian sub, although I doubt it could launch a Trident as the delivery system.

Okay, but the thread is about rich people themselves. Sure, it’s not great that the system allocates things so lopsidedly.

It’s more like “everyone needs no nukes”. It’s just that being one of the nuclear powers is so much easier…

Having a delivery system in case we do decide to go down that path seems reasonable.