

A few of those even have actual real live victims, unlike video game porn. This whole debacle is truly absurd.
A few of those even have actual real live victims, unlike video game porn. This whole debacle is truly absurd.
Just getting around to trying it now. Will update with further info.
Very first impressions:
Yep, its sexo pokemon snap! If you’re into furry or pokephilia, and enjoy photography, this’ll probably be a fun time. It seems like it is more anthro focused though, not that I’d be a good judge of any of this or anything. >_>;
Right off the bat, the walking animation is very janky, but otherwise it seems surprisingly polished. The tutorial is a bit info dumpy, but it’s not that overwhelming.
Just starting actual gameplay now.
Edit 1: Managed to soft lock myself on the very first quest. Got stuck in a tent flap. Lol. Fixed with a reload.
Edit 2: Now I can’t find this expedition log for the 2nd part of the first quest. This does not bode well. I swear I should work in QA, as I can’t find anyone who’s had this problem.
I’m giving up for tonight. It kinda feels like nobody play tested this.
Is Sapphire Safari… a furry porn version of pokemon snap??? I’m going to try it for shits and giggles because I adore pokemon snap. Wish me luck.
Man, fuck everything about thia. Obviously fuck Dougie for letting this sort of shit happen, in the first place. But also wtf was happening in triage where they’re monitoring this kids oxygen levels drop and they can’t get him priority status. I don’t know how it’s supposed to work, but it’s surely not supposed to go like this.
It’s also kinda crazy that they didn’t pack up and drive 30m to downtown TO where there would have been much better emergency services. Did triage string them along? It’s absolutely baffling.
I wish Ford would be held personally liable for this absolutely avoidable death.
Cool, so if it’ll be fine with them anyways, why not give them a veto.
When asked whether land claim organizations have a veto, Obed said provisions in their agreements “could be defined as vetoes, but really we see them as enabling.”
Is that a weasel I smell?
could be defined as vetoes
Is it an actual veto, or is it not?
I think you just have to commit to it. It’s only a problem when people are unfamiliar with them. Once They’re exposed enough, they’ll get the hang of em pretty quickly. They just need to be fairly ubiquitous.
Perhaps, but it’s much harder to abuse a speed bump for nefarious purposes.
Lane width restriction is my preferred method, but speed bumps are probably even more guaranteed to be effective.
OK, so what’s the argument against using other traffic calming measures that don’t steal money from people, and are just as, if not more, effective instead?
A good start would be to join France in recognising the legitimacy of the Palestinian state.
Appreciate the clarification. Guess I missed the memo when they changed that a few years back!
I mean, for me it literally makes all my purchases 1% cheaper for zero cost so long as I pay the full amount monthly, which I do. It’d make no financial sense to not take advantage of it.
This IMO is part of the problem, because I’m incentivized to take money away from local businesses and give it to the CC duopoly.
Not all CCs have annual fees. I’ve got one with no fees and I still get 1% back.
The problem is there’s no incentive to use it, as you don’t get the kickback your credit card provides. I’m not sure how the CC duopoly tricked us into disallowing retailer cash/debit discounting.
There’s a massive opportunity to use the US’s current anti-science sentiment to reverse the brain-drain that’s been going on for decades.
Divided? Only the CPC seem to be divided. Everyone else is firmly in favour of elbows up.
I always thought Conservatives were supposed to be more nationalistic, but it seems they’re happy to believe another country’s populist. I wish all the wannabe Americans would self-deport, but the US won’t take em.
Thank you for the very interesting peak behind the curtain!
I generally make it a policy to try my best to never be angry at workers who aren’t in the top 1% of income distribution. Usually problems like this arise because corporate has bad policies which result in workers unable to adequately address the situation.
It shouldn’t be up to the customer to police this. The CFIA needs to be doing a few more spot checks to ensure compliance.
Although I suppose any fines are effectively going to get passed on to the consumers anyways. :/
It’s been a thinly veiled secret that the dentistry industry in Canada is rife with charlatans recommending and performing unbeneficial procedures. It shouldn’t be too surprising that there’s going to be an increase in scrutiny on these practices, and that it’ll result in a lot of rejected requests.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ixo0V6rNqi0
I just hope it doesn’t end up going too far in the opposite direction, and necessary procedures are cancelled or delayed.
That said, it also seems like a lot of these rejected claims are from mistakes in the filing process, and these should lessen as providers get acclimated.
Based.