I don’t think it will work for Firefox. I’ll have to convert it down the line when I got most of the features knocked out

It’s a browser extension for chromium based browsers like brave.

https://github.com/solidheron/peertube_recomendation_algorythm

I tried to make the alfo as simple as possible. It matches the words of the videos descriptions title and tags to other other videos words and ranks them via cosine similarity (de-ranks then via if the video has been seen before)

I should add a blacklist for keywords because I’m kinda sick of all the Linux content and there’s a lot of Linux content on peertube

I use duct tape to cover bright lights

I’m lost

Founding fathers would be amazed at the lack of bloodshed their system has made and would probably be like amazed at all the propaganda

Porn

Yeah if you have better way of doing anything with no drawbacks you should do that I’ll just say out of pure reason.

Thinking about deterministic results. I can think of a flawed code that gives a wrong result deterministically 1 out of its thousands of potential outputs and you can determine that 1 wrong answer is A) not big enough flaw to fix(code is good enough) B) not worth fixing since it’s rare (too much effort to fix). Now how that applies to LLM is that you can see the what LLM outputs and determine it’s execution is good enough or not working.

Using a lot of resources at the cost of the environment is more a value thing. Cyanobacterial didn’t care about poisoning the environment with oxygen. Ironically I don’t think the electric grid should be restructured for ai since I don’t think so is doing anything important enough to warrant changing the electrical grid.

I would care if someone was rude or unqualified on an issue. Id want to know why something I did was wrong, either technically or morally, or if there a better way of doing and why it’s better