The D Quuuuuill

i’d see if you can find velour replacement pads. this will reduce the head seal, which will let more sound in and will change the sound signature a little, but it will also last a lot longer for normal day to day use

dehumanization

the hell? how’d this end up in this thread!?

deleted by creator

hooray! learning about the abolition of poverty through the framework of making computers go beep boop wasn’t a total waste of time!

oh my god. i’m so excited right now. i majored in Computer Linguistics and Philosophy in college. i have a degree in exactly this. so… a computer programming language (PL) is a dialectic set of commands that can be composed and then compiled into machine langauge (ML) and interpretted by the computer into manipulations on a data structure. the primary goal of a PL is to facilitate human to human communication about what the program’s ML will do. there has only ever been one serious attempt to create a PL with the breadth of expresson of human language (HL) through Perl. this has generally been found to be a bad idea.

however, Perl revealed still addressed some very serious issues in computer linguistics that are starting to be addressed now 30 years later. the biggest success story to come out of Perl is Ruby. see the problem in computer liguistics is that almost all of the PLs in any kind of use are structured around Germanic, Italic, and Ruthenic grammars. this is especially damaging for people whose people have been opressed by speakers of these languages. there’s been a burgeoning movement to structure at least SOME PLs around native languages in Siberia, Africa, southeast Asia, and North America, especially languages that are at risk of total elimination like Lakota, Lomavren, and Ongota. unfortunately we also have to confront the colonial economic forces that have been strangling these languages as no boss wants code written for business in a PL structured around a critically endangered language

TLDR: you’re absolutely right to summarize things how you have, but the proplems at play are WAY more interesting imo

There’s already documented sexual abuse

and given nintendo’s history, the RoW market is a fun side project for them

i was coming in here to recommend exactly that!

yeah this is the era of COINTELPRO, they were only helping minorities while on camera

wouldn’t really expect it to be

it does not. end to end encryption and point to point encryption are two ways of delivering an encrypted message to a destination. a point to point encrypted message has a message and header that are decrypted by every node in the network to determine where to route it next. an end to end encrypted message has its header and body encrypted separately such that only the sender and recipient see the body, but the nodes can read the header for routing. encrytion at rest just means that the message, once saved to disk, is encrypted

i’m less worried about me not buying their games and more worried about the folks who buy madden every year even though the last interesting release was 08

very apt meatphor, especially when you consider the development and enjoyment of games has consistently been part of the human experience.

a lovingly crafted game is a gourmet meal, each ingredient lovingly selected based on experience and a desire to give the recipient a special experience that will stay with them emotionally long term

a big studio game is fast food combination meal, each component focus tested after optimizing the whole pipeline to reduce cost to the investor and the resulting experience leaves the recipient feeling empty and unsatisfied. sure, occasionally something innovative will come along like a first person openworld sandbox or a 4 pack of cinnamon poppers, but eventually the big firms will replicate what’s working at other firms and you’ll be left with every studio offering the equivalent to chicken nuggets, hamburgers, fried chicken sandwhiches, french fries, and soda

i love toronto fans. second best fanbase in the majors (biased source, pfp is a nats hat)

hey canada, actually keep up the good work. we got some folks down here who don’t get it yet. we’ll be in touch once we’ve fixed our shit

it’s not perfect, but i’ve just been gathering interesting links into my org roam notebook

In this case I get it. I really get it.

This is a scenario where a single node VPN would reduce, not increase OP’s security stance. You do have to worry about NK hackers breaching your services because they’re all exposed through the single node VPN server. Same attack surface, less knowledge needed to hit the target with the payload.

VPNs are not a panacea by any stretch of the imagination. they are good for certain use cases but from OP’s description they would do next to nothing