Sickos [they/them, it/its]

yeah, haha, good…hahaha okay

  • 0 Posts
  • 7 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: December 6th, 2020

help-circle

  • Idk that I can agree, but I can respect your viewpoint without agreeing with it. Personally, I’m a little too far to the “an” side of ancom to vibe with prevailing thoughts about the lumpenproletariat. Like, folks who want to just exist should be supported in that endeavour to any extent that it’s feasible–and where not feasible, while not actively supported, they shouldn’t be actively opposed or punished. “Lazy”, with its strictly negative connotations, feels kinda punishing.

    Though, again, I would support applying it to someone who seeks status and standing without applying effort; I just rarely if ever see it applied in that manner and would lean toward abolishing the term rather than engage in the effort to define it as such–which I suppose is lazy behavior by both definitions.


  • I feel–among the working class folks I have known–that actual attempts to skirt all personal responsibility have been far less frequent than accusations of laziness toward folks who are just burned out by life and work. I do believe that laziness is a prevailing occurrence among the wealthy, but I do not see accusations of it thrown their way often. When viewed in this light, fighting the concept/usage of “laziness” inherently protects the working class.

    I think anyone from hexbear who says “laziness doesn’t exist” still subscribes to “from each according to their ability, to each according to their need”, and statements made should be viewed with that in mind.

    Anyway, I bear no ill will, I just wanted to share where the “laziness isn’t a thing” folks were speaking from. Carry on, comrade.