• 0 Posts
  • 60 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 5th, 2024

help-circle
  • Yep, that is why the plot of Infinite was to me more a bunch of not fully thought through but cool sounding concepts instead of a proper and fully consistent story and world. I like the game for its art style, game play and atmosphere, but it is 100 % not making sense.

    And now that you spell it out to me, I never realized before how directly contradicting that ending was to the whole concept of Bioshock 1.

    Because to me it lost the point at the moment where they said:

    spoiler

    There are infinite Raptures. Because then we only saved them in that one single world and there are unnumbered other worlds where saving them didnt happen. So why even care at that point or feel great for saving 1 out of an infinity?


  • Thanks for explaining it to me in more detail.

    While I understand what you mean and agree that Infinite and its DLCs throws everything before out the window, I would argue that Fontaine was just the first bullet that killed Rapture but there were many more bullets waiting in the magazine, so to say. The oppression and inherent wrongness of Rapture, including the addictive behaviour of Adam combined with the inherent and even desired power structures would have driven it down the drain either way. Probably later than the New Years Eve party, but it was in my mind always on a path of self destruction.

    And yeah, BioShock 2 was done without the involvement of Ken Levine, so he sadly didn’t really saw it as part of “his baby”. I liked BioShock 2 and Infinite, but Infinite felt more like an alternate canon spin off than part of the main series. For me they are simply similar but different beings, not of the same continuity.










  • Thanks for that compilation, it’s always interesting to read about different cultures.

    my reasons for positive review:

    • having fun (or liking the game for singular astonishing positive parts, if the whole game has some.flaws)
    • wanting to support smaller studios (I’m more forgiving for a 1 person studio instead of AAA) if I think the game is still worth to be supported

    My reasons for negative review:

    • shitty behaviour by developer after my buy (removing content, adding shit content like microtransactions, etc.)
    • unfun
    • technical problems that majorly impact my enjoyment

    In general I give most things the benefit of the doubt and can enjoy certain positive parts in a mostly bad game. so my reviews are mostly positive, as I curate already strongly what I buy.

    While I can understand why / how most of the reasons you talked about came around, I’m a bit baffled about the missing chinese localisation. Does that mean a significant number of chinese players buy a game simply to give it a negative review on steam? In the steam store it’s shown what languages are supported. So if you can’t speak any of those languages, why would you buy it?
    If the localisation is bad, then I can understand buying it and giving it a negative review due to feeling scammed.

    And I can give you an explanation for the number 1 negative reason: Poland, Czech republic and Turkey are all regionally close(ish for Turkey) to each other and you have it in your mind as European. Similar to probably Chinese having Korean in their mind, which most Europeans likely don’t think about.
    Maybe the translation company they asked had those languages and so they ordered it. And yeah, I can understand the developer. If I never intended to support a language due to unfamiliarity and then those language speakers are giving me negative reviews… feels unfair.
    Entitlement is the way I would describe it. Again, I can unterstand people wanting to play something and I can unterstand feeling left out for your language not being supported. But then buying the game and giving it negative reviews for that? Just don’t buy it or make community translations like so many others do.



  • This is a really mean thing to say out of the blue. You’ve assumed malintent when there wasn’t any.

    This you?

    If you know any teenagers/young adults who would enjoy “baby’s first psychological horror” this is a good recommend.

    Calling teenagers babies is condescending. Could have just left that word out and write “first psychological horror” or “introduction to psychological horror”.

    And regarding why say something: because they want you to learn about your behaviour and be able to learn and grow from it. So they care and think that you can improve instead of being a lost cause, where you just down vote and move on.



  • Wrufieotnak@feddit.orgtoGames@lemmy.worldGOG Summer Sale is here!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Depends on your definition of “make good”.

    After the first disastrous comment on reddit they issued a second one on Twitter which sounded like the first one should have in the first place.

    But that’s all and they didn’t address it inside the newsletter, so for me it’s empty words without really addressing the deeper issue of how much somebody in GOG fucked up.