Artwork

Since end-to-end encryption is still relatively new in commercial services, it seems that no one had ever examined it in detail before…
Source

Oh really?! Tell me about it!

In addition to KeePass, some may find “Pass” interesting, that is based on GnuPG - https://www.passwordstore.org/

Microsoft said this new variation of ClickFix uses DNS as a “lightweight staging or signaling channel,” enabling the threat actor to reach infrastructure under their control, as well as erect a new validation layer before executing the second-stage payload…
Using DNS in this way reduces dependency on traditional web requests and can help blend malicious activity into normal network traffic…
The downloaded payload subsequently initiates an attack chain that leads to the download of a ZIP archive from an external server…

Source

// Image source: Video comments

Thank you! I believe both titles are abs((float)$incredible)/INF… The story, characters, references, technical features, or every single bit and algorithm is perfect…

Not to mention upgraded kernels and shells, including drones and 'dgets!
Yet it all may not match the “good” you are searching for at this particular moment, or would it? How could we know!
Both titles were developed by different genius teams even, the former is Ubisoft Monreal, the latter - Ubisoft Toronto!
I.e. Even if MetaSploit and not Snyk’s or PortSwigger’s but FOSS is there… you may still find that the payload in all the exploits the solution provides you with, written by OSINT or more hopefully red… authors on the wires, is indeed a required parameter to be set upon execution/injection by you, the main host in the network! 🦋

How to not find Watch_Dogs 2 and Watch_Dogs Legion both very different and ineffably marvelous…
I uploaded a few screenshots found in some remote backups:
- Watch_Dogs 2: https://imgur.com/a/GZ7F88U;
- Watch_Dogs Legion: https://imgur.com/a/U07Yfch (Wrench is there, too, with Aiden!); 👻

Being bored and hateful is a choice. It all depends on what you are searching for, doesn’t it ^^

That is so… meta! ~ Wrench ✨

Thank you!

Sorry, no. And I am sorry you found LLM useful, and consider experimental/unverified data “dangerous”, likely inadequately or for the sense of hateful trolling, and it’s hard to live that way, I presume…

Related:
- https://lemmy.world/post/41419554/21487153
- https://mander.xyz/post/45102281/24408089
- https://lemmus.org/post/41151011/21366171

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey	Watch_Dogs 2

// Image source: Personal backups of screenshots

I never use LLM except for pentesting or experimental/medicine.
Meanwhile, I am sorry to know that you found it nonsense.

Not only the author of the post frame the ineffably marvelous Ubisoft for their Assassin’s Creed only, or the people in the organization who are not even related to the case, and for literally unknown reason, but also the author of the review feels like a disrespectful bigot who has likely a bad time yet enough to make a choice to inscribe their pure hatred into someone’s effort, history, and indeed novelty. One might want to suggest them to try creating anything at least remotely marvelous to the subjects, they try speaking at, with their own hands…

Such a deep sorrow some people do not care about their actions, about anyone, including artists, developers, people in general… and ruin this world in hatred and utter, disgusting unfairness…

You do you, @Speedforce@multiverse.soulism.net and that reviewer, and let’s hope no one will state something so awful about your work after decades, hatefully believing their word has any weight the world outside their mind of hatred.

A dear kindergarten is it…

No, thank you. Sorry, never.

Not only that, but the huge probability of mistakes is just deafening. The last time I used LLM was in 2023 someone recommended for a task at paper work, and I got a literal headache in 10 minutes… Since then I never ever will use that sorrow for anything that is not for blackbox pentesting or experimental unverified data generated you may find in medicine or military isolated solutions.

That deafening feel that every single bit of output from that LLM or void machine may contain a mistake no soul is accountable for to ask about… A generated bit of someone’s work you just cannot verify since no source nor human is available… How would you trace the rationale that resulted in the output shown?

Faster? Is that so… Doesn’t verification of every output require even more time to test it and consider stable, to prove it is correct, to stay accountable for the knowledge and actions you perform as a developer, artist, researcher… human?

Your mind is to be trained to do a research, remember, and do not depend on someone’s service to a level of predominance/replacement.
Meanwhile, effort, passion, creativity, empathy, and love, in turn, you carry, supports in long-term.

You may not care now, though, but you do you. It’s your mind and memory you develop.

Thank you! You do you.

deleted by creator

In other words, that article is about “self-hosted mind atrophy with skills degradation running in parallel.”

No. Absolutely no. You should code with your mind, and stay creative.

Related: Using AI Generated Code Will Make You a Bad Programmer