

exactly my point, I’d suggest automating that before I bothered with PRs that upgrade versions, as it’s a waste of time.
exactly my point, I’d suggest automating that before I bothered with PRs that upgrade versions, as it’s a waste of time.
“manual changes”, which connotes “local changes”
It doesn’t. Manual as in a PR with upgrades that you’re suggesting yourself, as opposed to running dependabot.
Putting up a PR with changes isn’t considered a manual anything.
If I have to open a PR myself, that’s very much a manual change.
that’s a lot of FUD, topgrade just upgrades using all package managers you have, it doesn’t do the upgrades itself bypassing the manager that installed it, or package authors.
dependabot is a tool for repos, not to apply local changes
That may work for a handful of projects. It’d be my full time job if I did it for everything I run. Also, I might simply suggest maintainers to adopt dependabot or an alternative before I spend time with manual changes. These things should be automated.
what’s the alternative? Write a PR yourself?
upgrade all things by default
you do have an nginx process with PID 2511847
using the port
get more info with
ps aux | grep 2511847
or kill it, if you need to spawn a new one with the right configuration
find out which process is really binding to 443 if you don’t recognize that port as being used
sudo ss -unapt | grep 443
This is such an underutilized and neglected behavior.
The very least a config parser should do is to log a warning.
because of garbage like that I always use the long option names in scripts, even when the short one would be obvious
I’ve been doing that for years. Rollbacks are very rare, to the point that it doesn’t make much of a difference whether I do them all at once or not, other than spending more time to do it.
If I wasn’t using containers for everything, sure. Otherwise it’s a bit of an excessive concern.