

At the expense of everyone’s privacy even if you don’t participate in the loot box economy, because you know the laws won’t be written for only if you access them it’ll be a blanket requirement. That’s not the way to get rid of loot boxes.


At the expense of everyone’s privacy even if you don’t participate in the loot box economy, because you know the laws won’t be written for only if you access them it’ll be a blanket requirement. That’s not the way to get rid of loot boxes.


“The market” is captured. Consumers don’t really have a choice. Businesses have to follow the law, no matter how terribly written.
If those laws are effectively being written and pushed through by a tiny handful of billionaires with their own agenda, consumers don’t have a choice at all.


It really is fascinating how that simple concept seems to elude them entirely.
Even if you don’t know what a Confidential Informant is… And how that works… It’s effectively the same idea as Immunity. I’m sure they’ve heard of that concept.


Freaking Hydrogen cars. Dead end tech with a fuel that’s extremely difficult to keep in place. For whatever reason the big asian car manufacturers like Honda and Toyota seem to refuse to admit will never take off, after more than 2 decades trying.
I’m fascinated by their insistence on a technology that is clearly doomed. The embodiment of the sunk cost fallacy. They insist on trying to continue to make Hydrogen a thing, with no plan for infrastructure which is even more complicated than DC fast chargers, while not even attempting to expand EV offerings that people want in the meantime.


Epstein was no idiot. Keeping some incriminating shit to use as leverage is smart scumbag 101.
Don’t know. That’s not my specialty.
But it’s definitely not by compromising everyone’s privacy and forcing them to identify themselves because the government wants to be able to identify everyone everywhere at all times and uaing children as the excuse like they always do.