

The operative phrase in that entire article “housing without profit”.
Until that makes sense in north america, we will not take a page from Europe.
The operative phrase in that entire article “housing without profit”.
Until that makes sense in north america, we will not take a page from Europe.
Canada doesn’t have the capacity to build these, especially at low public fund margins.
Freeland isn’t an idiot, she knows her way around trade. She’s out of her league in transportation, though, I agree.
This isn’t a thing because there are many comics that don’t adhere to “frames”. They overlap with others, use the whole page, etc.
But beyond this, decompress your CBR/cbz files and use imagemagick to find frames and isolate them.
ELK stack
Lolol yes, elastic was a pig for me too
That’s a good point, and it’s one that isn’t solved yet in the foss space.
There are some success stories like Blender, and other projects like Thunderbird and KDE who have recently made their model work through voluntary donations, albeit by hiring competent management of such donations. And there are lots and lots of projects somewhere in between.
The interesting questions to me aren’t so much about Plex, but the infrastructure behind all the tools we use: NTP on Linux, build tools, ffmpeg libraries, etc. Lots of other companies make products that make money, yet kick back nothing to these.
Would a royalty system work? I dont know.
Yes, you got this bang-on. Plex made the decision long ago.
There are a few ways Plex could have played this:
The point is there are lots of companies who do this right and don’t have such a blatant disregard for the user. In the long run, this will not help Plex, it will help other streaming service helpers who are actually willing to respect users.
I know you’re not defending Plex and I acknowledge that. However, I see a lot of “How are they supposed to make their money?” arguments here, hence my description above of just a few models Plex could have chosen instead of f**king the customer.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I agree.
I will add, however, that Jeff’s main concern isn’t the policy itself, but that he and other youtubers can’t see it or know what the rules are. The lack of transparency is the real issue.
They’re the 800lb gorilla, and no other platform can create “youtuber” income, so it’s a real problem for people like Jeff Geerling to move from yt, even if they know it’s bad, because it’s a major part or all of their income.
YouTube restored the video, but not until Jeff had made a huge stink about it (and rightfully so, those yt fuckers can eat a dick).
Clout and profit.
The most important thing is to use your common sense, think about it an extra minute before punching holes in your fw, and keep those holes documented and to a minimum.
I don’t think anyone is triggered by blockchain on its own (although reading the room would suggested making blockchain a part of your product is dumb).
But calling blockchain and crypto “p2p” is like saying highways are social hangouts just because there are lots of people on them at any one time. There is no equivalence there, because the makers of this product are not making a social platform.
Sharpen your scam-detecting skills, my friend, for your own safety.