• 0 Posts
  • 331 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle
  • Sorry, but Quebec and Alberta are parts of Canada. Even they admit that they are presently under the control of Canada’s federal government, and were not forced into that at gunpoint (Quebec, in particular, voluntarily joined Confederation when it was first set up and has been a part of Canada from the moment there was a Canada). That a minority of their citizens don’t like that state of affairs is does not make them separate countries.

    Taiwan, on the other hand, is not part of China, even if China would like it to be. It is acknowledged as a separate country by the international community, and its government is in no way beholden to that of China. The difference is not subtle and not a matter of debate.



  • To be honest, I’d start with the following four rules about what data is presented and how:

    1. No secret sauce: Any ranking algorithm, and all the inputs to that algorithm for any post, must be available to all logged-in users. If that clashes with privacy laws, that information can’t be used in the sorting algorithm.

    2. Keep it simple, stupid: If, given the algorithm and a randomly selected set of posts with attached information, a person of average intelligence cannot order the posts according to the algorithm in a reasonable amount of time, the algorithm is too complex and should be discarded.

    3. No means no: All social media must provide the following basic filters: “Don’t show me any more posts by this account” and “Don’t show me any posts whose algorithmic inputs fulfill these conditions (for instance, “Don’t show me any posts with >100 downvotes”)”, and showing a user a post they have indicated they don’t want to see will be treated as a crime.

    4. Little by little: Endless scrolling is not permitted. Feeds and search results must be paginated, so that the user is occasionally jarred loose from their train of thought.

    .

    Lemmy needs a little more work on rule 3, but is otherwise doing pretty good.


  • It’s bad for everyone, therefore ban it for everyone. There. Done. Of course, the protests would be immense once the “think of the cheeeldrun” figleaf was pulled off.

    Or, write strict and well-enforced laws regarding data collection and retention and on-line moderation and forbidding the more addictive qualities of commercial social media—but even then, some nastiness will inevitably slip through the cracks. Some people are just evil, and we have no way of heading them off before they’ve already done harm.








  • “Genocide” is in fact appropriate when speaking of some specific tribes—ask any Beothuk. Oh, wait . . .

    Granted, not many tribes were completely destroyed, so the pedantically correct charge in most cases is probably attempted (but not successful) genocide. At what point does the government, and by extension the non-indigenous population of Canada, cease to be held responsible? All I can say is, not yet. The last residential schools didn’t close all that long ago, and the government is still periodically lashing out in court against its treaty obligations toward Indigenous peoples. At minimum, we have several more generations to go.


  • Short version: no one in Ontario wants to hire trade apprentices, and there are multiple problems with the certification process (many of which may be traceable to the fact that the testing is run by a third party, which has no incentive to do more than they were contracted to do, rather than by the body that’s technically issuing the certifications). Plus the usual issues of discrimination that have been there forever seem to be causing women, in particular, to leave the trades before getting fully certified. And misallocation of provincial government funds that were supposed to be put toward fixing some of this, because Doug Ford.



  • The problem is that the other measures may not be enough for some people to avoid heat stroke.

    Filling stations require you to have an existing reasonably clean bottle to fill. Drinking fountains require there to be one located within a reasonable distance to whatever else you’re doing. And some of the people who were being given the bottled water were drug-addicted or metally ill and off their meds, which might not exactly do wonders for their planning ability.

    Handing out bottled water isn’t really the best way to fill the gaps, but it’s easy to get bottled water, so the only problem is deciding how to pass it out. Any other solution requires more upfront planning, and likely more investment.