• Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    He didn’t mention tech …tech is the most dangerous too the US has for subjugation right now. Any deal with any companies tied to musk, Thiel or Ellison are Bad Bad. I really don’t understand why Carney would join Trump and Netanyahu’s “peace board” that’s glaringly corrupt

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      He did… but just one sentence: “And on AI, we’re co-operating with like-minded democracies to ensure that we won’t ultimately be forced to choose between hegemons and hyperscalers.”

      And Carney was only invited to be on the board, but it seems we’re not going to be paying the billion dollars Trump is demanding. So it doesn’t seem likely that’s going to happen.

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Carney: “The old order is not coming back” = provocative

    Trump: “I shit on the world and will take over a territory because I didn’t get a shiny medal” = Trump discusses international policy

    FUCK THE MAINSTREAM PRESS

    • ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      The order that he referred to never truly existed. It just was never aimed at fellow Global North nations. Basically what Trump is doing is, for all practical purposes, the real reason why Hitler is (was?) the most hated human in recent history and not, say, Mussolini. Fascists like Mussolini directed their ambitions towards non-Western countries and never threatened fellow Europeans, so they all laughed at his big chin and bombastic movie-inspired poses (no joke, his famous stare and folding arms pose was taken from a 1916 or 1915 film). Hitler was originally supported by many European leaders and both liberals and conservatives. Why? Because as a fascist he fucking hated communism and had no problem massacring and/or imprisoning as many of them as possible. It wasn’t until he started being aggressive towards other European nations and bringing about the same colonial mentality home to Europe and treating Europeans the same way they treated Indians and Africans did they take a stand. (BTW, Hitler made no secret of this. He wrote it all in Mein Kampf. But then as now, most people never read the book. Churchill was someone who was confirmed to have read the book before Hitler came to power and was opposed to him from day 1).

      This is basically the same mentality that schoolyard bullies have and their enablers. When they attack the more awkward kids or anyone perceived as being different for any reason they don’t care. The moment those bullies start to make anything remotely offensive towards their enablers, however, that is when they lose their shit. My biggest weakness (as an autistic adult) is that I was lead to believe that when you grow up all those behaviors and people will be left behind and they also will change. This… is why it took me until I became middle aged to even BEGIN to have a career or some feeling of being taken seriously. My faith in simply being honest, straightforward, and having faith in others to have some basic curiosity or understanding was my undoing.

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The order that he referred to never truly existed…

        You didn’t hear the speech, did you? Carney clearly says this in it. He goes in detail about how it was all smoke and mirrors and the countries that benefited from it, simply played along knowing full well it was a sham

        I, unfortunately, do agree with your statement… I wish we lived in a better world but that is not the case

        • ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I did hear most of it, including that part. I hated how he compared the ‘illusion’ to the slogan Workers of the World Unite! It pisses me off that I fear we will never truely be rid of that oligarch shit that has plagued society from the dawn of civilization.

  • twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Is it possible Canada could join the EU? I’d love it if all America’s former allies just formed a “cool club” and started isolating the US.

    • Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The EU is working with Australia to grant non visa status. We’ll be next. The new world is connected, not isolationist. We don’t have to join the EU, the world is bigger than Europe, and we can just make our own co-op world. With blackjack and hookers and all the fun stuff.

    • snoons@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      IIRC this question was seriously asked by Carney a little while back, and we can in all but name. I don’t think there will ever be a Canadian minister in the European Council but we could form trade networks that are basically the same as European nations with the caveat that there is the Atlantic ocean separating us.

      • Jessie@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think what OP may also be asking for are travel benefits. As it stands, EU citizens with an EU passport have extremely powerful benefits when travelling within + outside the EU.

        I just wish we had an inter-ocean train…

        • snoons@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          We should all tell Carney to fast-track a 900 trillion dollar sub-ocean high speed rail tunnel.

    • Reannlegge@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I would love it, however we are an exporting economy so having the euro as our currency may hurt but also trade with the EU would be easier.

      The US is not going to be standing as it is by this time next year, maybe sooner.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Adopting the Euro isn’t required for being a member of the EU. UK used to be a member of the EU after all, and they never used the Euro.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Aren’t they being stricter about that for newer members?

        • Reannlegge@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          As much as I doubt it would happen I would love to get to use the Euro if not for only the stronger purchasing power but for removing the dead people and royal family from our money.

  • OliveMoon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    We have the most eloquent, educated, kick ass leader! I shudder to think what PP would be doing under these circumstances. He’d probably be peeing his pants…

    • ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      He is an extremely conservative, highly anti-worker, and a lot more authoritarian than you think. Also eloquent? Compared to the competition your average high school debate team is probably more eloquent than those jackasses. Trump was always a trash mouthed jackass his entire life, and it never harmed his crimes.

  • sik0fewl@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 days ago

    Using words just big enough that Trump won’t understand what he’s saying. Smart.

    • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      Reminds me of a Trudeau speech just before he left. He spoke to Canadians and used typical 6th grade english politicians use when adressing very large audiences. Then he adressed Trump directly, looked right into the camera and immediately switched to mono syllabic caveman speech. I swear you could even see a suppressed smirk peek through. I laughed so hard and long I couldn’t hear what he actually said to him.

      • OliveMoon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        But, it wasn’t Trudeau. Have you watched the Carney speech at Davos? The whole world stood and clapped. Carney has worked his ass off to find trades away from the U.S.

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s a good speech. He’d be a great prime minister if he weren’t so fond of fossil fuels, military spending (as opposed to actual defence,) and authoritarian bullshit in the name of security as exemplified in the infamous “border security” bill.

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think the border security bill was an initial attempt to placate the Orange Turd… I completely disagree with it anyway, but I am not sure it is part of what Carney would have done under different circumstances

      So far I am not finding myself agreeing with Carney too much but this speech was solid and some of the deals and partnerships coming up in the news have been pretty positive (at least with the info available)… so there is hope?

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Carney’s reliance on fossil fuels does stick out as somewhat against his own book, Values. This is all speculation, but my theory for the reliance on fossil fuels is that it has a history of econimcally strengthening nations (at least if we ignore pollution), and has historically proven to be a valuable and desired resource globally and domestically. Given he is navigating the biggest economic shift Canada has seen in decades, fossil fuels look like a safe, but not neccesarily the right choice.

      • Kichae@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes, exactly. Actions speak louder than words, of course, and his actions around fossil fuels feel very counter to his published words, but he has also said that we are at economic war now, and war time decisions need to be much more pragmatic than peace time ones.

        He said it all today: Countries that cannot feed themselves, fuel themselves, or defend themselves are now supremely vulnerable. We can feed ourselves, and we can fuel ourselves, and we can fuel and feed others. We need to offer that so that they will defend us, as we build up the means to defend ourselves.

        Shaking off being a US vassal state is going to get a little messy.

        • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yes, unfortunately when push comes to shove, environmentalism will often be pushed aside to level the playing field.

    • Glide@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Okay, 100% with you on his love for fossil fuels and military spending, but what specifically has he done to be deserving of calling him out of “authoritarian bullshit”?

      • kbal@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Read a few more words there and find out. He didn’t write that legislation, but he approved of it, has had the power to stop it all along, and has not renounced it.

        • Glide@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think I perceive that event as Trump appeasement more than authoritarian bullshit, but I at least get where you’re coming from, and I agree that it was a bullshit move. I liked Carney for being someone who I had believed would stand up to Trump, as opposed to our other option, who is still likely still trying to brush the flavour of boot leather out of his mouth. Doing shit to placate the orange turd is just going to empower him. We already saw this once with Hitler and the strategy of appeasement; we don’t need to see it again.

          • kbal@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            The bill itself was full of maximally authoritarian bullshit, causing all the civil society groups to oppose it as loudly as they did. It remains around in some form, last I heard, still theoretically in the legislative process somewhere, a continuing threat to us all should the Liberals feel confident enough to try and pass any of the worst parts of it into law.

            It might’ve been an attempt to appease Trump, or it might’ve been pushed by some Trumpist infiltrator within the party, I don’t know. Optimistically, we can hope that Carney wasn’t really aware of what was in it, and on a topic outside his areas of expertise he was simply misled by people he mistakenly chose to trust. In any case I’m sure he will have learned from the experience.

  • MarkWandering@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Is Carney perfect? No. Is he the best PM we have had, and the perfect man for this situation? Yes.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I watched a few interviews with Carney throughout the election to get an idea of who he is and the policies he might support. One detail that really stuck out to me is he was a goaltender when he played hockey. Canada has a big mean offensive oaf taking shots at it, and Canada elects a goalie as a response.

    • darcmage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      The texts:

      “My friend, We are totally in line on Syria. We can do great things on Iran. I do not understand what you are doing on Greenland."

      “Let us try to build great things, i can set up a g7 meeting after Davos in Paris on thursday afternoon. I can invite the ukrainians, the danish, the syrians and the russians in the margins. let us have a dinner together in Paris together on thursday before you go back to the us. Emmanuel.”

      The assumption is that he leaked them in response to an earlier quote from Macron:

      “We do prefer respect to bullies. And we do prefer rule of law to brutality.”

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      What the actual fuck, I had to check and:

      Also NATO’s sec:

      Assuming this is real, is this shit commonplace or are these bootlickers outliers?

      • Yeather@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        I doubt these are actually text messages sent to him from Macron, but possibly messages passed from Macron to a Trump lacky and then reinterpreted in a way Trump can read. No clue about SecGen.

      • paraphrand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        There’s no way Trump understands screenshots. So at minimum, if true, the posting of these are a collaboration with a handler.

    • ruuster13@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Macron has been brilliant with foreign policy. A little less with domestic policy. Still he’s been boldly playing 4-D chess with Putin and 1-D checkers with Trump.