cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/7671573

Sweden knew Canada’s Marc Kennedy was a notorious cheater.

So they set up a camera at the ‘hog line’ to record it.

And caught him doing it at the Olympics.

tweto

  • aim_at_me@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    If it doesn’t impact the rock, then why do they risk breaking the rules to do it?

    • Glide@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Because extreme cases can impact the rock. Barely touching the rock in the way caught on film realistically isn’t impacting the rock, but the rule needs to exist to prevent someone from actively pushing the rock after letting go.

      But again, these guys know better and have had the time and resources to train better.

      • WraithGear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        21 hours ago

        ok, but we are talking about a sport that is using brooms to micro melt the ice, and on a molecular level changing how the rotation changes the direction of this rock… someone touching the rock seems much more impactful

        • Glide@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Fair enough. I realize now that I spoke with more confidence on the reality of the situation than I intended. Any avid curler I’ve spoken with regarding this in the last couple days swears up and down that the level of interaction that supposidly occurred between the curler and the rock is genuinely a non-factor. I do not know from any level of personal experience, hence why I stated that I trust whatever Olympic panel exists. I merely wanted to counter the poor argument that “the rule wouldn’t exist if it can’t impact the rock,” as the rule can absolutely exist for the purpose of more clear cut cases.

          Armchair analysis is rarely worth taking seriously. I suspect that neither of us actually know from experience, but maybe you’re a professional curler.

          • zjti8eit@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Like in baseball there is a rule that the bat can’t have more pine tar on it than the width of home plate. It was put in teh rules in 1901 or something, no one has any idea why and the fact they once overruled the results of a MLB game related to it is astonishing.

          • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Fair enough. I realize now that I spoke with more confidence on the reality of the situation than I intended.

            That is a refreshing statement to read. A person after the truth disregards his own personal feelings and allows for possible reconsiderations. Let’s make this the 2026 thing to do! All the best.

        • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          17 hours ago

          It really isn’t. Those rocks are heavy, a light touch like what’s seen in the video would have very little impact.

          Changing the friction of the ice on the other hand has significantly more impact because of how heavy the rock is.