The truth is that homes deliver enormous non‑financial value — stability, community, belonging. Those are reasons to buy. But as financial assets, they come with structural constraints: They are expensive to maintain, difficult to trade, impossible to diversify, and usually purchased with significant leverage. The investment component is real but volatile, and its return path can be long and uneven. For home buyers now facing losses, this is not an individualized failure. It is the predictable outcome of society promoting an undiversified, illiquid, highly leveraged asset as if it were the ultimate life goal.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/commentary/article-the-myth-of-homeownership-as-an-investment-is-wreaking-untold-damage/

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    You need shelter. You can pay money and have nothing at the end, or you can put it into equity.

    I generally agree, a home should not be primarily thought of as an investment.

    It’s a roof over your head that you have more control over than if you were living in a rental.

    And after a period of time, you actually own it and no longer have to keep paying someone else for the privilege of having a place to live.