Waiting for the “Whoops, we ‘forgot’ to remove it”.

  • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Oh, I’m aware of that. Just that courts will not rule against things that involve the use of AI in general. You cannot take the output directly from, but once a human gets involved they will allow it. There’s too many monied interests to allow the restrictions.

    • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That’s the fun part of all of it though, there’s no definition or even subjective ruling of what constitutes “substantial transformation” or any running that generative AI being derivative of copyrighted material, it’s a complete legal clusterfuck of law and consequences.

      But yeah, I do agree that if a running or law change came about it would definitely be in the favor of late stage capitalism.