Waiting for the “Whoops, we ‘forgot’ to remove it”.

  • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    You don’t see the use in an artist viewing an approximation of the finished product

    I don’t because that’s not what artists do.

    Artists are not people who bring nearly finished projects over the finish line. And if your finished project does not look anything like your nearly-finished AI assets, what are you actually using them for?

    • moakley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      You’re saying artists never look at their work and decide to change something. Ok, buddy.

      • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Okay, well if you’re going to be like that, I’ll talk to someone else:

        An artist’s job is to pull together research, resources, history, knowledge, opinions, their own fluency in the language of the medium they’re using, and a bit of inspiration, and turn that into something interesting, or cool, or flashy, or thought provoking.

        AI generation, even for the concept phase, skips 90% of that effort.

        You can’t fabricate something with AI and then re-make it by hand later because these are two halves of the same process. By the time the hands are involved, there is very little left for them to do.

        • moakley@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          That’s a narrow definition of an art that doesn’t apply to real life. Like it or not, Marcel Duchamp won the argument over whether or not he was an artist.