Thats true its actually better because the corps get to suffer losses while i still get to enjoy their products anyway, sometimes in ways better then those who actually are paying customers.
Financial boycotts are still boycotts. In this scenario, it’s not the material that’s problematic (presumably), but rather the financial ties of the parent organization.
Continuing to consume and engage with their products is not boycotting.
Thats true its actually better because the corps get to suffer losses while i still get to enjoy their products anyway, sometimes in ways better then those who actually are paying customers.
Financial boycotts are still boycotts. In this scenario, it’s not the material that’s problematic (presumably), but rather the financial ties of the parent organization.