A case study in why credentials are revoked before firings.

  • Maeve@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Update: The company that employed the brothers went unnamed in court documents but was identified in the press as Opexus. An eagle-eyed Ars reader points out that, back in December, the company gave a series of quotes to Cyberscoop about the entire incident. Though Opexus did background checks, the company admitted that “additional diligence should have been applied,” it acknowledged that “the terminations were not handled in an appropriate manner,” and it said that “the individuals responsible for hiring the twins are no longer employed by Opexus.” Clearly, the failure here was all-encompassing.

    🫪

  • jqubed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I remember working at a TV station where I got caught in a round of layoffs. Most of us they told in advance, that our last day would be in six weeks, but they laid off an engineer at a smaller station and had him gone immediately. They also deleted his account that day, and that’s when they discovered he was running a lot of station processes through his own account. I think it took the corporate engineers a week to get everything back to a fully operational state.

    • Da Oeuf@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I do something like this at my workplace. I guess it gives me leverage, but the main reason is that my boss drags his heels so much when I try to improve the workflow that it’s easier for me to just crack on without his knowledge.

      Apparently this is common enough that there is a term for it.