Nodding to the “Fortress North America” concept floated by Ontario Premier Doug Ford and some U.S. interests, which prioritizes continental co-operation in the face of Chinese economic threats, Carney said this new relationship would “re-imagine co-operation in specific sectors deeply challenged by global competition.”

Carney said the U.S. is dependent on Canadian oil, natural gas, electricity, aluminum, potash, nickel, copper and industrial components, and the two sides should do more business together in these sectors, not less.

“That is mutual strength. Canada Strong will help make America great again. The examples are legion where we should work together and compete with the world together,” he said.

  • RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s clear you disagree with some of his actions, I’m curious who you believe would be better in his position right now, and how they should address the US-Canada relationship.

    • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Carney was the best person for the job, as of the last election. That doesn’t make him a good choice, nor does it justify his actions.

      He keeps sounding great in speeches to Canadians and Europeans, and then behaving horribly. The amount of damage his policies and cuts will do to the environment is devastating. His unwillingness to shut down Smith months ago hashelped produc the shitshow in Alberta. And he keeps saying elbows up, while accommodating Trump.

      What I would like to see would be polite disregard for the US. Meet with Mexico and get a draft agreement pencilled ahead of the CUSMA talks. Get serious about building Gripens in Canada and politely shift away from the F-38, not because we don’t want to work with the US, but because it’s not in Canada’s best interests.

      Fighting the US (financially or militarily) will go badly for us, but he shouldn’t go out of his way to deal with them any more than necessary.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      He who sleeps in the lion’s den ought not be shocked when he is eaten.

      Any leader who would seize all American assets and ready the war machine would be an improvement.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        This is such a keyboard warrior comment. Sure buddy, prepare the war machine against a country that would be done first day, by lunch. The could be done in time for brunch in Montreal.

          • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            For what? Military invasion? Do you have any clue how much it would cost to ‘prepare’? If we did that, we would end up exactly like the USA: broke in debt and only using taxes to feed the military. So what are we defending from then?

            And guess where all the money would go for this preparation. US military contractors. Prepare for a war you already lost.

            • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              You outlined the current scenario. A proper leader would only use Canadian tech hence powering our war machine not theirs.