Nodding to the “Fortress North America” concept floated by Ontario Premier Doug Ford and some U.S. interests, which prioritizes continental co-operation in the face of Chinese economic threats, Carney said this new relationship would “re-imagine co-operation in specific sectors deeply challenged by global competition.”

Carney said the U.S. is dependent on Canadian oil, natural gas, electricity, aluminum, potash, nickel, copper and industrial components, and the two sides should do more business together in these sectors, not less.

“That is mutual strength. Canada Strong will help make America great again. The examples are legion where we should work together and compete with the world together,” he said.

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    I get that the headline is triggering (intentionally so), but the reality is that he is talking to US business people, speaking their language, and telling them that working with Canada is better for them than working with the guy who is threatening Canada.

    If he can nudge them to be less supportive of Trump’s bullshit, it is better for Canada.

    Even better if he can convince some of them can use their bought-and-paid-for influence on the US government to get them to back off on attacking Canada, it can be a win.

    • patatas@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      MAGA is quite literally a white supremacist phrase. It is part of the fascist project to invoke an idealised nationalist nostalgia for a supposed “better time” when there was segregation and/or slavery. (For Black or Indigenous Americans, has America ever been “great”?)

      That is what the phrase means. There is quite simply no excuse to invoke it in a positive light.

        • patatas@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 minutes ago

          Sorry, but there is no conceivable scenario in which adopting the language of white supremacy makes the world a better place.

  • Auli@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Canada needs to look after Canada. Saw on the news Canada looking for a trilateral trade agreement, well Mexico already in talks with US for bilateral agreement. Exactly what happened last time.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Carney is really good at speaking to the room. Therefore, I say he needs to GTFO of the US and spend more time in Europe, where he brings out his best quips.

    • RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s clear you disagree with some of his actions, I’m curious who you believe would be better in his position right now, and how they should address the US-Canada relationship.

      • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Carney was the best person for the job, as of the last election. That doesn’t make him a good choice, nor does it justify his actions.

        He keeps sounding great in speeches to Canadians and Europeans, and then behaving horribly. The amount of damage his policies and cuts will do to the environment is devastating. His unwillingness to shut down Smith months ago hashelped produc the shitshow in Alberta. And he keeps saying elbows up, while accommodating Trump.

        What I would like to see would be polite disregard for the US. Meet with Mexico and get a draft agreement pencilled ahead of the CUSMA talks. Get serious about building Gripens in Canada and politely shift away from the F-38, not because we don’t want to work with the US, but because it’s not in Canada’s best interests.

        Fighting the US (financially or militarily) will go badly for us, but he shouldn’t go out of his way to deal with them any more than necessary.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        He who sleeps in the lion’s den ought not be shocked when he is eaten.

        Any leader who would seize all American assets and ready the war machine would be an improvement.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          This is such a keyboard warrior comment. Sure buddy, prepare the war machine against a country that would be done first day, by lunch. The could be done in time for brunch in Montreal.

            • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              For what? Military invasion? Do you have any clue how much it would cost to ‘prepare’? If we did that, we would end up exactly like the USA: broke in debt and only using taxes to feed the military. So what are we defending from then?

              And guess where all the money would go for this preparation. US military contractors. Prepare for a war you already lost.

              • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                You outlined the current scenario. A proper leader would only use Canadian tech hence powering our war machine not theirs.

  • AGM@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Every time I hear “Fortress North America,” I’m reminded of Josep Borrell’s “the Garden and the Jungle.”