• healthetank@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 days ago

    The problems I’ve seen, as an adimittadly casual air-source carbon capture follower, are that no system in use currently can actually prove viable. All the calcs and test samples don’t line up with field results. For sure we need to figure out why and make it work, but it being sold as an answer is still extremely suspect

    • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      Keeping in mind that this is the Beaverton, the most trusted news in Canada, CCS is just part of the green washing PR so liberals can get that warm fuzzy feeling inside like something is being done when practically things get much worse.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      If it can’t be made to work, we’re fucked. It sucks that we’re dependent on making an unproven technology work, but that’s what we’ve come to.

      • Kichae@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 days ago

        The issue is that it continues to be sold as if it does work. It’s been used as leverage when proposing more oil projects, and as a greenwashing panacea for politicians, for 20+ years now, despite that it’s complete vapourware.

        They needed to made to work before it was used as an excuse to drill-baby-drill. Not 30 years later.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Yeah many things should’ve been done 30 years ago. That’s irrelevant now. The only thing that matters is what is done now.