• Sundray@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    There’s got to be something between coddling children on the one hand, and just letting the worst businesses on Earth freely prey upon them unhindered.

    • ratel@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      No no that requires thoughtful policy which means less time sitting in the heavily subsidised bar in the Houses of Parliament.

    • doleo@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Whatever you suggest, I would say that putting the guilt onto the shoulders of the minors, rather than the companies producing an exploitative product, is the wrong move.

      But, as ever, it’s easier to control the proletariat than the rampant oligarch class.

  • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I know we’re on the Onion but surely in this instance it’d be better to ban social media from children rather than ban children from social media; if you get my drift.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      True, but that would put the burden on multi billion dollar international conglomerates who can reasonably be expected to be able to do anything about it.

      Can’t be making such demands of the people handing out legal bribes to the legislators, of course, so we’re gonna have to go with a solution that’s

      • difficult to impossible to comply with,
      • places an unnecessary and unfair burden on people who are not at fault in the form of time, effort, and possibly money
      • unlikely to solve the problems we claim it’s necessary for
      • guaranteed to volatile civil liberties, including suppression of legal dissent and cutting off people from necessary information

      It’s the capitalist authoritarian way!

  • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    this is bad satire in the sense that it’s buying the idea that this has anything to do with protecting children. even if we square off the whole mandatory iD for everybody who uses the internet bit and just focus on the children, this is absolutely the UK yet again leading the fight against distain for the youth because they’re young. they oughta play in the streets like I did when I came back from campaign market garden in 1965 at which point I want the police to beat them up for impeding car traffic

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Kids these days…

    I still have my state-provided bucket of sand. Learning to appreciate the scratchy eyes prepared you for the real world.