• CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I too think we‘re long past the point of calling games that released as recent as 15 years ago retro because they simply don‘t evolve in the speed they used to.

      Imagine looking back at 1993 when you’re in 2008. Yeah, that’s a huge leap in technology. But look back at 2011 now and you realize that stuff doesn‘t feel nearly as ancient.

      From all I know a game needs to be at least 20 years old to be considered retro these days. That‘s the most common definition you will find these days.