• Undearius@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    24 hours ago

    It’s often cheaper to ship something on a boat and have it travel 15,000km around the continent than it is to send it 3,000km on a train.

    Maybe fix the rail industry instead of just putting money in their pocket.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      On the other hand it’s significantly cheaper (and more efficient and less polluting) to ship across the country by rail than it is by truck.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Isn’t this also to do with how massive a ship is, so shipping is cheap per container?

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 minutes ago

          Have you seen a cargo ship though, the train car comtainers on it look tiny, and are stacked above deck like a tower and below decks. Sometimes as much as 10000 to 20000 containers, All going one place.

          Trains are 100 containers long maybe, I think it is only 50 in Europe. And have to switch routes to get across the network, and makes delayed stops in trainyards for connection changes .

          They just don’t have the same bandwidth as a giant ship.

  • theBannanaAndCoffeeDude@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I like how the have the crappy yard locomotives in the background. Never far from the shop because their constantly breaking down, and pollution like there no tomorrow.

    • HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      The pollution caused by flying mass instead makes a crappy yard locomotive with pollution like no tomorrow look like a fart in a hurricane.

      Something tells me it’s not about the pollution.