• quick_snail@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I mean if you think ABC gave too much of a platform to the terrorists (which provide no evidence to their claim), why didn’t you link to a news source that’s more objective than ABC?

        This is a huge story. It’s surely been covered by more than one media outlet. Some news sources are probably more blunt in their coverage in saying that the Israelis committed a war crime by murdering volunteers, claiming unsubstantiated bullshit without providing any evidence

        • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I meant that the Israeli gave the typical talking points.

          And I shared the ABC article because that’s what’s referenced in the post.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I am not quick-snail, but I presume they mean a link to original ABC source instead of a Twitter screenshot.

        It does make me uncomfortable to see Twitter cited so much across lemmy. And doing so would be good information hygiene, anyway.

        • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          That’s what I assumed too and specifically provided the ABC source. Which is why I’m confused.

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            It’s still not in the OP though. Most viewers on Lemmy are just going to see the tweet.

            It’s not a huge deal to me since it links an actual journalist (Evan Dyer), but… it’s still bad information hygiene. I think linking the original source should be the gold standard for Lemmy. We can do better at sourcing than pasting screenshots.

            • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              I see what you mean. But the ABC article doesn’t mention Flickinger, so it wouldn’t have been relevant to the Canada community as is. The CBC reporter tweet about a Canadian death makes it relevant.

              Edit: also going back to the original comment, I think they’re asking why did I share the ABC article if I said it was full of Israeli talking points. And my answer would be that it’s the ABC interview/article that the CBC reporter mentions.