I’m responding to the fact that there are a bunch of downvotes on a post asking why it’s fine for Carney to chum it up with Stephen effing Harper on the basis that it’s not Poilievre
what’s weird is they (well, most) pretend not to. It’s amazing that people are defending this mostly on the basis that it’s the NatPost reporting it — like, what do they think the Post’s secret evil game is here?
I have asked what people think about this beyond the fact that the article is from the Post, and have not received a single response criticizing Carney. Perhaps you’d like to be the first?
I’m responding to the fact that there are a bunch of downvotes on a post asking why it’s fine for Carney to chum it up with Stephen effing Harper on the basis that it’s not Poilievre
(I think the people who like Carney also like Harper)
what’s weird is they (well, most) pretend not to. It’s amazing that people are defending this mostly on the basis that it’s the NatPost reporting it — like, what do they think the Post’s secret evil game is here?
The comments rightfully criticizing the National Post are not defending Carney, stop conflating the two. Do not share Postmedia, always downvote.
There is a single comment in this thread endorsing Carney’s action, which deserves pushback, but you’re lashing out at everyone else for no reason.
I have asked what people think about this beyond the fact that the article is from the Post, and have not received a single response criticizing Carney. Perhaps you’d like to be the first?
sorry everyone didn’t know that’s against the rules
Sockpuppeting is frowned upon everywhere. You just destroyed any credibility you might have had. Well done.
hello, genius, i am using the same account and asking why replying to my own comment is somehow not ok. how is that “sockpuppeting” lol