Reminder that NatPo is an american-owned rag.
So is Mark Carney. Any comment on the substance of the article? Harper is a far right christian nationalist
Harper is more left wing than the US dems lol
The nazionalist post is a fascist American owned propaganda outlet. Harper is Chair of the IDU, the worldwide umbrella org of fascists.
IF anything relevant was here, I’ll wait for better people to say it. It’s not like exclusive investigative journalism of consequence ever comes out of this shithole.
When this same fact is reported in a different newspaper, will your opinion of the actual event change? Just trying to understand what the real issue is here
I’ll look for reputable sources worthy of reading and consideration. Friends don’t let friends read the post.
Edit: a compulsive liar telling the occasional truth doesn’t justify giving them the time of day.
It’s been reported in the Globe, Star, La Presse, and CBC. But it’s not the headline. Have fun defending your hard right PM just because you don’t like this particular messenger
Fuck Harper, but if it chaps PP’s ass, I’m happy for it.
Don’t forget Harper’s think tank helped the gop
Oh, I know. And right wing parties world wide.
so then why are you happy that Carney is palling it up with him?
Did you completely miss the “Fuck Harper” part, or are you just playing dumb?
Nobody is celebrating them being friends. I’m laughing at the fact that Harper doing this completely undercuts PP and makes him look like a joke. You can dislike Harper and still find it hilarious when he makes PP look like an irrelevant toddler.
Yeah, he’s a truly vile person
God this place is disheartening. These folks only see sports teams. Carney and Poilievre are not meaningfully different other than the fact that Carney is more effective at doing the exact same stuff Poilievre would do. None of this “chaps PP’s ass” because they are fundamentally on the same team. CUE THE DOWNVOTES FROM THE CULT
Calling everyone who disagrees with you a “cult” is pure bullshit.
You can hate Carney for being an out of touch central banker, but pretending he’s the same as Poilievre is just stupid. One of them actually understands economics and the other panders to conspiracy nuts and wants to burn down basic governance just to get elected.
Throwing your hands up and saying “they’re on the same team” doesn’t make you smarter than everyone else, it just means you don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about.
so … we have a hard-right PM and that’s cool because he wore a red shirt instead of a blue one? Trying to wrap my head around the logic of any of this
Liberal geniuses owning the … libs? Hey Lemmy me thinks we have an astroturf problem
Are you replying to yourself here?
I’m responding to the fact that there are a bunch of downvotes on a post asking why it’s fine for Carney to chum it up with Stephen effing Harper on the basis that it’s not Poilievre
(I think the people who like Carney also like Harper)
what’s weird is they (well, most) pretend not to. It’s amazing that people are defending this mostly on the basis that it’s the NatPost reporting it — like, what do they think the Post’s secret evil game is here?
sorry everyone didn’t know that’s against the rules
