• ragepaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Did you completely miss the “Fuck Harper” part, or are you just playing dumb?

        Nobody is celebrating them being friends. I’m laughing at the fact that Harper doing this completely undercuts PP and makes him look like a joke. You can dislike Harper and still find it hilarious when he makes PP look like an irrelevant toddler.

          • patatas@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            If your reaction to Harper and Carney chumming it up is to immediately think of Poilievre instead of what this summit means for Canada, then sorry but you have completely lost the fucking plot

        • patatas@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 days ago

          If your reaction to Harper and Carney chumming it up is to immediately think of Poilievre instead of what this summit means for Canada, then sorry but you have completely lost the fucking plot

          • ragepaw@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            Adults can look at policy implications and still laugh at the petty political fallout. You don’t need to put on a monkish vow of misery to understand what a summit means.

            You’re the one screaming at downvotes, replying to your own comments, and crying about imaginary cults. Don’t lecture me about losing the plot.

            • patatas@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              9 days ago

              lol

              show me where you look at the policy implications. All you’ve been doing is slinging mud after being called out for trying to deflect away from the fact that Carney is Harper’s boy

              • ragepaw@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 days ago

                Nobody owes you an economic whitepaper just to point out the obvious political reality. Harper stepping onto a stage at Carney’s summit leaves Poilievre standing outside yelling at the clouds.

                You demanded to know why someone who despises Harper is laughing at the optics. I already told you. Demanding a comprehensive policy essay after your lazy strawman fell apart isn’t an argument, it’s just moving the goalposts so you can keep arguing with the voices in your head.

                • patatas@sh.itjust.worksOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  Here are the optics: Carney is a hard-right winger and Liberals are twisting themselves into knots to talk about any other aspect of this

                  • ragepaw@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    9 days ago

                    This purity-test brain poisoning must be exhausting to live with. Carney isn’t “hard right,” he’s standard-issue establishment.

                    You’re doing that classic dumb-ass routine where anyone who doesn’t adopt your exact hysterics is immediately labeled a right-wing plant. Normal people can be critical of corporate summits and still enjoy watching the CPC caucus eat dirt. You don’t get to hand out report cards to the room just because your binary worldview can’t handle both.