• ragepaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    You’re doing the internet equivalent of throwing a handful of spaghetti at the wall, declaring checkmate, and running away.

    “What would Carney have to do to lose your support?” What support? I’m a card-carrying NDP member, you colossal dumb-ass. You spent twelve hours assuming that because I laughed at the CPC losing their minds over Harper, I must be a die-hard Liberal stan. Your brain is so thoroughly broken by online tribalism that anyone who doesn’t echo your exact melodramatic buzzwords gets filed away as the enemy.

    Nobody owes you answers to your laundry list of conspiratorial panic just because you’re desperate to validate your fragile ego.

    • patatas@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I haven’t “run away” anywhere, as you can see. And although I don’t believe you, I still maintain that if your first thought about Carney selling this country for parts is that Harper being there will annoy Poilievre, then you might want to re-evaluate your priorities. But go on, shoot the messenger a few more times

      • ragepaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Right back to the exact same talking point you’ve spammed four times now. Your record is skipping.

        “I don’t believe you” is classic. Of course you don’t, because if I’m not a foaming at the mouth Carney worshipper, your entire meltdown makes zero sense. You have to invent a villain so you can play the brave, persecuted “messenger” instead of just a guy who humiliated himself in his own comment section.

        • patatas@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          It’s not my talking point, it’s yours. You brought up Poilievre. I’m trying to figure out why it is that you are so upset by me calling this out. Why are you so mad about this?

          • ragepaw@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            I’m not upset. I’m just thoroughly unimpressed.

            You demanded to know why people were laughing at Poilievre, got your answer, threw a tantrum because it didn’t match your script, and now you’re playing amateur therapist in the replies. If pretending I’m furious helps you cope with how badly you bungled this entire thread, hold onto that blanket tight.

            • patatas@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              5 days ago

              yes, you’re so unbothered that you keep coming back for more of my “unhinged” behaviour