…
China’s Treasury holdings may not be shrinking at all, just changing address, and the clue is a $600 billion pile with Canada’s name on it.
…
According to the report, DoubleLine’s Vitaliy Liberman noticed that Canada’s stockpile of US debt securities had grown aggressively to nearly $600 billion of Treasuries and bonds, despite a tit-for-tat tariff war between the two countries. Liberman was told that the increase was in fact due to China, which has been moving US securities to custodian banks outside the United States.
…
China’s reported ownership of US Treasuries has fallen. Some investors and analysts believe that decline reflects China shifting its holdings to accounts in other countries, rather than actually reducing them, in order to give the appearance of decoupling from the United States. [The claims are unconfirmed.]
…
The question matters because China has historically been one of the biggest foreign buyers of US government debt. A genuine Chinese retreat would remove an important source of demand for Treasuries at a time of heavy US borrowing, while hidden holdings would suggest that demand is more stable than the headline numbers imply. The appearance of decoupling would also carry political weight amid trade tensions.
…
As an addition, official numbers by the U.S. Treasury show that largest foreign holders of U.S. treasury securities are Japan and UK, holding 1.1 and 1.0 trillion dollars, respectively. China is the third-largest holder (618 billion dollars) as of July 2026.
Canada is among the largest holders, too, counting for 426 billion dollars as per July this years. According to the linked report, this number has now increase to roughly 600 billion dollars, despite a ‘tariff war’ between Canada and the U.S.
…



@Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca
This is wrong. In February 2026, Chinese regulators have advised financial institutions to curb holdings of U.S. Treasuries due to concern over concentration risk and market volatility …
Just a few weeks ago, on 17 September, the South China Morning Post - a propaganda media outlet based in Hong Kong under the Chinese Communist Party’s censorship regime - reported that China cuts US Treasury holdings to 18-year low amid global bond sell-off. The SCMP says China has "“ersistent concerns over sustainability of Washington’s finances” and that China “see[s] overall foreign holdings [of U.S. debt] shrink for second consecutive month.”
There never was any evidence for China’s sell-off, but China’s rhetoric haven been pointing into that direction for a long time now.
I don’t even mind your insults, but you should at least try to not spread fake news.
Haha look, it’s easy to do a quick Google search about “times that China sold US debt”, but you’re still proving my point because you’re out of your depth and don’t understand what you’re sharing.
From your own quote (with my emphasis):
Yes, anyone can buy bonds. Private enterprises, individuals, governments. You’ve lumped them all in together because “China”, while the article you’ve posted talks about the Chinese government (that’s pretty racist if you didn’t know).
Here is a Canadian financial institution providing a similar advisory about US bonds trustworthiness. This is something that is happening globally btw - Denmark pensions, amongst others in EU, sold their US bonds (and these are actual government entities).
https://www.cibc.com/en/gam/insights/markets-and-economy/us-canadian-bond-markets.html
Then you use, by your own admission, a propaganda outlet that mentions the following:
Now a few things here
you’re contradicting yourself. The article you originally posted says that quite the opposite is happening in relation to what China says (that China is actually buying bonds, but with a different address), but now you’re referencing a “propaganda outlet” that China has been selling bonds. So what is it?
let’s go with if China is selling the bonds - yes, selling bonds off slowly over several years (maintaining bond prices) is a very big difference to dumping (making prices plummet). So not sure what you’re trying to disprove with sharing that.
Here is my original premise for reference: